Immigration Law is Our Only Focus
Immigration can be stressful at the best of times, but when a government agency makes a mistake or harms your future you need an expert to help fix it.
Legal Services
Impactful Litigation With a Human Connection
Our team’s knowledge, experience, professionalism and teamwork offers strategic counsel and exceptional service in federal immigration litigation. Whether you face a denied immigration request, long delayed adjudication (‘Mandamus’), or complexities with your immigration history, we will partner with you to receive a fair and just legal procedure. Our focus areas include:
- Litigating denied and revoked immigration applications;
- N-336 Naturalization Appeals;
- Suits for Naturalization and defending Denaturalization suits;
- Delayed immigration applications;
- Litigation to invalidate government regulations and policies;
- Responding to proposed regulations;
- Complex RFE and NOID responses.
Our team of professionals provides a personal experience and expert advices needed to face our client’s unique challenges.
- Jonathan D. Wasden
Immigration Litigation Attorneys with Nationwide reach
Call us today to schedule a consultation
Immigration Litigation Attorneys with Nationwide reach
Call us today to schedule a consultation
Our unique blend of immigration law expertise and federal court litigation gives clients the edge they need to prevail against immigration agencies.
Relationships
Identifying the right attorney for your case is tough. The flow of information and honest assessment of the situation are vital to making the attorney-client relationship work.
Respect
Once we study your case, we will give you an honest and transparent assessment on whether our unique services can meet your requirements. We assure you that we will act quickly and work within an accepted time frame.
Results
Our knowledge, experience, professionalism and teamwork offer strategic counsel and impactful results.
Recent Successful Cases
ITServe v. Neilsen
In 2018 the Department of Homeland Security published a new rule prohibiting third party placement for F-1 students on OPT/CPT. However, they did not go through the required “notice and comment process…”
Shergill v. Mayorkas
As part of the fight for H-4 and L-2 employment authorization Wasden Law filed suit alleging USCIS violated the statute by not giving L-2s employment authorization “incident to status…”
Eddakuni v. Mayorkas
In 2019 the Trump administration unsuccessfully attempted to use the legal process to remove the regulation allowing H-4 EADs. They then created a biometric requirement of all Form I-539 applicants…